The Blackboard has been updated with new content; a post titled Obama’s team of admirers as well as updates to the Resource page. The Resource page has been updated to include two reports detailing the scope of Stop and Frisk as it is used in New York City. The ACLU Report: Beyond "Deliberate Indifference": An NYPD for All New Yorkers (Nov.2013) and the New York Attorney General Office Report on Stop and Frisk (Nov.2013) is now included in the Resource page.
The Resource page has also been updated with resources for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Voting Rights, Race and the current financial crisis affecting Detroit. This page will be continually updated with links to new resources. There are two pages currently being worked on that will include links to critical thinkers such as Malcolm X, John Henrik Clarke, Arturo Schomburg, Vincent Harding, Walter Rodney and several others. In addition, there will be a page tentatively labeled Bookshelf where there will be a listing of books and their summaries that will help advance our understanding of politics, history as well as the current developments as they emerge.
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Obama's Team of Admirers
With just days left for the 113th Congress to finish their business before the year is out, this Congress appears to be the least productive in history. Between January 1, 2013 and December 2 - a paltry total of 55 laws were passed. Recently though, Senate Democrats voted to eliminate the filibuster on executive and judicial nominations (except Supreme Court nominees). Now, a simple majority of 51 votes is needed rather than the 60 previously required to override the filibuster. This power move by Senate Democrats snatches away a key tool used by the Senate Republicans to obstruct the process by denying nominees a committee vote. The new rule will enable the nominees to move forward since they will be shielded from raucous partisan politics in the Senate. Nominees for key positions such as Jeh Johnson (Secretary of Department of Homeland Security), Janet Yellen (Chairman of Federal Reserve), Mel Watt (Federal Housing Finance Agency) along with the D.C Circuit Court nominees, Patricia Ann Millett, Cornelia T.L. Pillard and Robert L. Wilkins can move forward.
Jeh Johnson, the nominee to run the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has passed out of committee and is headed for a full Senate confirmation vote. Last week, Roland Martin of NewsOne, “moderated” a brief yet rather contentious debate on Mr. Johnson’s qualifications. The debate erupted between panelists, Dr. Wilmer Leon and Angela Rye, when Ms. Rye took issue with Dr. Leon raising doubts regarding Mr. Johnson’s qualifications. During the spirited back and forth, Dr. Leon analysis focused on policy and on Mr. Johnson’s political views while Ms. Rye’s argument centered on DHS needs. She also appeared to lament over the double standard afforded to African American nominees. “You have to be twice as good to outpace everyone else,” asserted Ms. Rye. Dr. Leon pointed out Mr. Johnson’s position on the U.S. drone policy and countered, “I don’t question his credentials as an attorney, I question his competence from an ideological perspective. I just don’t see a lot of his positions consistent with the Constitution in this country.”
Jeh Johnson, the nominee to run the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has passed out of committee and is headed for a full Senate confirmation vote. Last week, Roland Martin of NewsOne, “moderated” a brief yet rather contentious debate on Mr. Johnson’s qualifications. The debate erupted between panelists, Dr. Wilmer Leon and Angela Rye, when Ms. Rye took issue with Dr. Leon raising doubts regarding Mr. Johnson’s qualifications. During the spirited back and forth, Dr. Leon analysis focused on policy and on Mr. Johnson’s political views while Ms. Rye’s argument centered on DHS needs. She also appeared to lament over the double standard afforded to African American nominees. “You have to be twice as good to outpace everyone else,” asserted Ms. Rye. Dr. Leon pointed out Mr. Johnson’s position on the U.S. drone policy and countered, “I don’t question his credentials as an attorney, I question his competence from an ideological perspective. I just don’t see a lot of his positions consistent with the Constitution in this country.”
Thursday, November 21, 2013
The clock is ticking...
There’s no other way to say it – the Obama presidency is in crisis, reeling from all the problems and issues associated for their badly mismanaged launch of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) website. October 1st was the first day of enrollment for the nation’s uninsured to attain health insurance through market exchanges.
President Obama signed his signature policy, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), three years ago in March 2010. Since then, the president has faced a relentless stream of criticism, obstructionism, and heavy opposition from GOP conservatives and the Tea Party faction. Over the course of three years, the conservative opposition have taken to successfully tagging the legislation, “Obamacare”, failed in their many attempts to defund and repeal ACA, and went so far as to shut down the entire federal government for 16 days at a cost initially pegged at $24 billion dollars. In recent months, Dr. Ben Carson emerged as the black conservative who would take the Obama presidency to task with his ridiculous linking of ACA to slavery.
The recent scrutiny and revelations about the problems associated with ACA has now clearly surpassed GOP attacks on ACA’s premise and purpose – as the national spotlight now shines on the self-inflicted wounds created by the Obama administration. Initially, the focus was on the continuing issues associated with the ACA website, followed by revelations that folks were being dropped from their insurance policies because their policies were deemed “unqualified” under ACA guidelines. “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan…” was looped over and over and over again to highlight yet another broken promise made by this president to the American people. The president’s poll numbers indicate declining trust and credibility brought on by the ACA debacle. His apology to those who lost plans was debated while his sincerity was questioned by conservatives. To neutralize congressional actions to address the dropped plans – the president announced his plan to help the people who lost their plans so they can be able to keep their plans.
While the president set a November 30th deadline to resolve the website issues – a recent hearing before the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce committee revealed that the website is only about 60 percent complete . Additionally, we now know that the administration knew of the problems months before the October 1st launch date. A report by McKinsey & Company outlined many of the issues that plagued the October 1st launch.
The emergence of these issues with ACA has prompted a stream of commentary disguised as analysis comparing the ACA problems to the death and destruction that followed Hurricane Katrina. While the issues with the ACA rollout are serious and significant – any attempt to link these problems to Hurricane Katrina is at best flimsy and unsupported with strong analysis. However, in light of the reports that have surfaced regarding information shared with the administration – the question comes up, “What did the president know and when did he know it?” But what may prove to be a bigger issue and one particularly for voters – what else is there that we don’t know? Are there other parts of the law lurking about in the shadows that hasn’t pierced the light of day yet? Furthermore, there are reports that President Obama’s proposed fixes for the dropped policies may cause even more problems.
President Obama has a steep mountain to climb to resurrect his popularity and legacy. Clearly, his legacy will certainly rest on the success of his administration’s efforts to resolve the ACA issues and concerns that are sure to surface during the remaining two years of his presidency. In light of the crisis the president now faces, can the president successfully “rebrand” and “remarket” ACA to remind the country of ACA’s long term objective of transforming the health care system and insuring the uninsured?
Millions of the uninsured are depending on him and the clock is ticking…
President Obama signed his signature policy, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), three years ago in March 2010. Since then, the president has faced a relentless stream of criticism, obstructionism, and heavy opposition from GOP conservatives and the Tea Party faction. Over the course of three years, the conservative opposition have taken to successfully tagging the legislation, “Obamacare”, failed in their many attempts to defund and repeal ACA, and went so far as to shut down the entire federal government for 16 days at a cost initially pegged at $24 billion dollars. In recent months, Dr. Ben Carson emerged as the black conservative who would take the Obama presidency to task with his ridiculous linking of ACA to slavery.
The recent scrutiny and revelations about the problems associated with ACA has now clearly surpassed GOP attacks on ACA’s premise and purpose – as the national spotlight now shines on the self-inflicted wounds created by the Obama administration. Initially, the focus was on the continuing issues associated with the ACA website, followed by revelations that folks were being dropped from their insurance policies because their policies were deemed “unqualified” under ACA guidelines. “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan…” was looped over and over and over again to highlight yet another broken promise made by this president to the American people. The president’s poll numbers indicate declining trust and credibility brought on by the ACA debacle. His apology to those who lost plans was debated while his sincerity was questioned by conservatives. To neutralize congressional actions to address the dropped plans – the president announced his plan to help the people who lost their plans so they can be able to keep their plans.
While the president set a November 30th deadline to resolve the website issues – a recent hearing before the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce committee revealed that the website is only about 60 percent complete . Additionally, we now know that the administration knew of the problems months before the October 1st launch date. A report by McKinsey & Company outlined many of the issues that plagued the October 1st launch.
The emergence of these issues with ACA has prompted a stream of commentary disguised as analysis comparing the ACA problems to the death and destruction that followed Hurricane Katrina. While the issues with the ACA rollout are serious and significant – any attempt to link these problems to Hurricane Katrina is at best flimsy and unsupported with strong analysis. However, in light of the reports that have surfaced regarding information shared with the administration – the question comes up, “What did the president know and when did he know it?” But what may prove to be a bigger issue and one particularly for voters – what else is there that we don’t know? Are there other parts of the law lurking about in the shadows that hasn’t pierced the light of day yet? Furthermore, there are reports that President Obama’s proposed fixes for the dropped policies may cause even more problems.
President Obama has a steep mountain to climb to resurrect his popularity and legacy. Clearly, his legacy will certainly rest on the success of his administration’s efforts to resolve the ACA issues and concerns that are sure to surface during the remaining two years of his presidency. In light of the crisis the president now faces, can the president successfully “rebrand” and “remarket” ACA to remind the country of ACA’s long term objective of transforming the health care system and insuring the uninsured?
Millions of the uninsured are depending on him and the clock is ticking…
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Stop & Frisk: Bloomberg Deception and fear mongering
unconstitutional, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted a stay on her ruling and went so far as to remove the judge from the case. The October 31st ruling blocks the numerous remedies outlined by Judge Scheindlin that would align the maligned police practice with the US Constitution until the whole appeals process plays itself out. This means, the appointment of monitor to oversee reforms, revised policies and training regarding stop and frisk and racial profiling, and the use of “body-worn cameras in a “pilot” project in one precinct per borough – “specifically the precinct with the highest number of stops during 2012” – would now be put on hold.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Intro...
From 1996 to 2003, I was a free-lance journalist and writer. My work has been published in The City Sun, New York Amsterdam News, The Final Call, The African Sun Times, The Black Collegian, The Black Star News, The Source, The Black Issues in Black Review, The Quarterly Black Review as well as The Black World Today and IMDiversity.com. I will soon post the links to some of these articles and book reviews where I could find them on the web.
I received third place honors from the New York Association for Black Journalists in the Spot/General category in 2002; attended the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa on assignment with The Black World Today and The African Sun Times; and I wrote the Commentary introducing Chapter 1, “Origins, Ancestors and Memory.” In Sacred Fire: The QBR 100 Essential Black Books.
Since 2003, I’ve been working in education in the state of Maryland. I started as a classroom teacher in the Baltimore County school system before I left to join the Baltimore City Public school system as a Data Analyst, Coordinator and then Director (interim) working in data reporting and monitoring in the Office of Special Education.
I’m a product of the New York City public school and university system graduating from Murray Bergtraum HS, Herbert Lehman College (Bachelors – Accounting) and Brooklyn College (Masters – Political Science).
I decided to start this blog because I have been away from writing for ten years now and I miss it – terribly. Once I started working in education, the demands were such that it made accepting assignments to write very difficult. I couldn’t juggle both. Although I continued recording my views on various political issues, I knew that I couldn’t do both and meet the demands that each would require. Like with all decisions, you can look forward or look back – I looked back…often. As much as I liked the work that I did as an educator, I loved my work as a writer. I want to do this blog because I have something to say and information to share. I will use the blog as a tool to highlight critical political issues of the day, particularly those affecting African Americans, bring attention to good work being written as well as promote my published work.
I will be writing about the important political, legal, social, economic and cultural issues of the day.
I received third place honors from the New York Association for Black Journalists in the Spot/General category in 2002; attended the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa on assignment with The Black World Today and The African Sun Times; and I wrote the Commentary introducing Chapter 1, “Origins, Ancestors and Memory.” In Sacred Fire: The QBR 100 Essential Black Books.
Since 2003, I’ve been working in education in the state of Maryland. I started as a classroom teacher in the Baltimore County school system before I left to join the Baltimore City Public school system as a Data Analyst, Coordinator and then Director (interim) working in data reporting and monitoring in the Office of Special Education.
I’m a product of the New York City public school and university system graduating from Murray Bergtraum HS, Herbert Lehman College (Bachelors – Accounting) and Brooklyn College (Masters – Political Science).
I decided to start this blog because I have been away from writing for ten years now and I miss it – terribly. Once I started working in education, the demands were such that it made accepting assignments to write very difficult. I couldn’t juggle both. Although I continued recording my views on various political issues, I knew that I couldn’t do both and meet the demands that each would require. Like with all decisions, you can look forward or look back – I looked back…often. As much as I liked the work that I did as an educator, I loved my work as a writer. I want to do this blog because I have something to say and information to share. I will use the blog as a tool to highlight critical political issues of the day, particularly those affecting African Americans, bring attention to good work being written as well as promote my published work.
I will be writing about the important political, legal, social, economic and cultural issues of the day.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)